点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
一日即四季 四季如一日……这是专属辽宁舰的“春夏秋冬”******
新春走基层丨一日即四季 四季如一日……这是专属辽宁舰的“春夏秋冬”
我国首艘航母辽宁舰入列十年来，航迹不断延伸，使命向深蓝拓展。无论寒冬酷暑，舰员们始终坚守在各自岗位，为战舰破浪前行、战鹰高空翱翔提供坚实保障。今天的新春走基层，我们走进海军辽宁舰，一起感受官兵们别样的“春夏秋冬”。
辽宁舰舰员
一天之内感受四季变化
这里是海军辽宁舰，上下有20多层甲板，舰员们分布在几十个不同岗位上，辽宁舰的训练海区也从渤海直到西太平洋。舰员们可以在一个航段，甚至一天之内，经历春夏秋冬的四季变化。
出海期间，在一天的巡查中，工作人员从深舱走到甲板、机库，见证了从夏季到冬季的气温变化。
现在的辽宁舰出海执行任务，经常南北跨越20多个纬度，气温相差30℃。在这样的环境下，气象水文保障对航母航行、舰载机起降至关重要。
舰艇上的“气象台”
辽宁舰气象班每天都要观测风向风速、能见度和各类天气现象，对危险天气进行预警预判。他们观测的实时数据会提供给预报员，最终变成送到驾驶室、塔台的气象保障建议。
一次任务中，歼-15战斗机正在进行起降训练，气象研判两个小时后有零星降水，建议尽快结束飞行。当时，海区内还是一片晴空，大家都对天气会商的结果产生了怀疑。但两个小时后，云雾逐渐笼罩，降水如期而至。
辽宁舰的气象水文中心是全军第一家设立在舰艇上成建制的“气象台”。他们在波谲云诡的远海大洋中洞悉战场风云，伴着辽宁舰的深蓝航迹不断成长，为航母和战鹰保驾护航。
从冬天出发
一路驶向夏天
甲板上，一架架歼-15飞机依次起飞、精准着舰。身穿紫色甲板识别服的航空油料兵承担着为战机加油的工作。在辽宁舰执行任务中，每天天还没亮，航空油料兵就得早早来到飞行甲板，开始一天的保障准备。
他们也是最靠近舰载机的人，也是最直观地感受着温湿、冷暖变化的人。有时候一个航次下来，他们从冬天出发，一路驶向夏天。无论气象条件如何，他们始终坚守在战位。
从北到南，气温从零下上升到二十多摄氏度，甲板保障人员脱下了厚重的防寒服，换上了轻便的夹克。
这就是专属辽宁舰的“春夏秋冬”
一日即四季 四季如一日
航母人用日复一日的坚守与奉献
践行枕戈待旦 胜战有我的
铮铮誓言
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)